Ministers

Ranking criteria

Ministers

Weighted civic score for Ghana public-sector accountability. The question sets emphasize service delivery, jobs and cost-of-living impact, public financial management, transparency, communication, and institutional trust. Benchmarked against current public concerns reported by Ghana Statistical Service, IMF Ghana program commentary, World Bank Ghana country priorities, and Afrobarometer Ghana governance/service-delivery findings. Last checked 2026-05-24.

• 20% How competent is this minister's leadership of the portfolio?
• 20% How well does this minister deliver against promises and timelines?
• 20% How accountable and ethical is this minister in office?
• 15% How clearly does this minister communicate with the public and Parliament?
• 15% How well does this minister handle crises and persistent service problems?
• 10% How evidence-based and inclusive are this minister's decisions?

Complete ballots are averaged per question, then each question average is multiplied by its configured weight. The score shown on each card remains that public average out of 10.

Rank order also applies a confidence adjustment: each entity starts from a neutral 5/10 baseline, and its public average carries more weight as more ballots come in. That keeps a one-ballot high score from automatically outranking a widely rated steady score.

Entities still need at least 1 ballot before they appear in promoted ranking positions.